Posted in Editoriale , Varie | Lunedì, Agosto 13th, 2007 | Trackback Posted in Editorial, Miscellaneous | Monday, August 13th, 2007 | Trackback
L’erezione di una nuova antenna sul Monte Orfano sta suscitando un forte dibattito tra i rovatesi, come dimostrano alcuni post inseriti in altre discussioni. The erection of a new antenna on Mount Orphan is leading a strong debate among rovatesi, as shown by some posts included in other debates. Proprio a questo riguardo abbiamo ricevuto da una lettrice un primo aggiornamento corredato da alcune foto. Precisely in this regard we received from a reader a first update accompanied by some photos. Lo pubblichiamo, restando in attesa che la stessa, come promesso, ci faccia avere nuovi aggiornamenti e una sua valutazione del caso. The publishing, remaining until the same, as promised, we do have new updates and an assessment of the case.
“Gentile redazione di rovato.org, vi scrivo a titolo personale per "Hello drafting rovato.org, I write to you personally for
segnalare a tutti i lettori interessati che proprio stamattina hanno report to all interested readers who have morning
proceduto a smantellare la vecchia antenna di Radio Montorfano nei proceeded to dismantle the old antenna of Radio in Montorfano
pressi del monumento ai caduti sul Monte Orfano. to the monument to the fallen on Mount Orphan. Mi sono recata sul I went on
posto per scattare alcune fotografie che immortalassero anche il nuovo place to take some photographs that capture the new
ripetitore radiofonico. radio repeater. Alcuni operai erano ancora all’opera alle 10.30 Some workers were still at work at 10:30
circa e vedendomi con la macchina fotografica mi hanno chiesto perchè about tree with the camera asked me why
stessi fotografando il traliccio e perchè fossi così interessata ai photographing the same tower and why I was so interested in
lavori. work. Ho risposto che stavo fotografando il panorama dato che quella I replied that I was photographing the scene since the
nuova costruzione faceva parte del panorama e che mi trovavo su suolo new construction was part of the landscape and that I was on the ground
pubblico. public. Ho domandato loro se ci fossero problemi e dopo essere stata I asked them if there were problems and after being
insultata sono stata invitata a trovarmi qualcosa di meglio da fare. insulted, I was asked to find something better to do.
Ovviamente non ho risposto agli insulti e ho continuato a fotografare. Obviously I have not responded to the insults and I continued to photograph.
Questo tipo di atteggiamento mostrato nei confronti di una persona This kind of attitude shown towards a person
sconosciuta (o forse no, per loro, dato che hanno insinuato che mi fossi unknown (or perhaps not, for them, since they implied that I had
legata alle piante per non farle tagliare, cosa che non ho mai fatto in linked to plants not to cut them, which I have never done
vita mia) mi ha destato un sospetto: che queste persone forse abbiano My life) I was raised a suspicion: that these people may have
qualcosa da nascondere? something to hide? Invito chi ne fosse in possesso a farmi I urge anyone who was in possession to me
pervenire fotografie dell’antenna fatte nei giorni precedenti, alla mia send photographs of antenna made in the days prior to my
mail: lancin@tiscali.it.” mail: lancin@tiscali.it. "
Cinzia
August 13th, 2007 at 8:20 pm
Dai Cinzia not you take too much with the workers themselves ... I know he does not care much landscape appearance
Waiting to have its new-yourself "news" ...
August 13th, 2007 at 10:51 PM
Cinzia Brava! we go to the end ... But I know that history will give the beautiful surprises! Congratulations to rovato.org for this area of democracy that gives all of us!
I know that we will see more than tiratine of ears, invoked by the good Angelo, professionals who have spoken on the landscape with a positive opinion!
Prosit!
August 14th, 2007 at 6:25 am
I have great confidence in Angel and I am sure that will not be limited to a mere tiratina ears of the Committee landscape. Her quarry on the commitment he has demonstrated: If it were not for him and his family, and the few willing Aged Committee who helped the cultivation of quarry would have started from a lot '.
August 14th, 2007 at 7:50 am
Cinzia Hello, I am sorry for insults, but how did you know plants, workers were Rovato?
comuqnue plants or not it should be checked until the end, Angelo certainly will do everything in its power to operate nn I doubt it.
We should understand how it could pass in committee landscape is what.
Nn I have never been against technology, development etc, but as said many times we have to do with the maximum fairness and integration with what surrounds us.
sperioamo well and available for this campaign.
August 14th, 2007 at 8:06 am
Cinzia, John,
my punzecchiatura was not an attack ad Angelo (in fact I quote him as good ... Angelo) and if it was understood I apologize.
I just wanted to stress that it will take courage, especially among those who are publicly committed in the country, to go up in the bottom of the story and, if necessary, to bring in evidence even possible misconduct, lightness or incorrect behavior of the administration Municipal.
For Cinzia: Article recovered Giornale di Brescia of you have suggested on to Erbusco antiantenne quarrel and Capriolo?
For John: read my post on the council? perhaps gives some ideuzze to verify and develop with the support of Rovato Futura. Or maybe not.
On like this, (my prodi)
Prosit
August 14th, 2007 at 3:20 pm
Opti was not intended as punzecchiatura, indeed.
we hope that comes out what I'm used to remove Ambaradan sight.
August 15th, 2007 at 9:33 pm
and the antenna on the market ?????
qlc who knows?
August 16th, 2007 at 12:29 p.m. pm
angel, check the resolution reached nr. 77, 07/05/2007. Will be seeking answers.
August 16th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Cavour,
where we find the acts in question? on www.comunedirovato.it have been able to find only the deliberations of the junta nr. 111 of 02 July 2007 onwards. Even that refers to reading it, it gives a summary or is kind enough to give the link where you can download and watch. Thank you.
Prosit!
August 16th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Here it is.
http://www.comunedirovato.it/b.....&pag=4
August 17th, 2007 at 7:52 am
Thanks Cavour,
and thanks to Vodafone for the pole, a suppergiù 200mt from the Venetian walls.
Prosit!
August 17th, 2007 at 10:09 AM
but you do not overdo this story with antennas!
I understand that the mountain (really inguardabile), but the market is in an area used as a parking lot with no landscape value!
then we avoid to park cars if ruining our dear Veneto (???) walls ...
and then what to say point to the COGEMA-2 mt from our beloved state 11?
August 17th, 2007 at 1:02 pm
Full transparency of public administration, through the publication of the resolutions to come, we can also analyze the economic aspects of the issue and compare similar problems.
If not mistaken, comparing the two contracts:
Antenna Vodafone (Resolution nr 77, 07/05/07)
Area 26 square meters, height 30m, contract duration 6 years
Amount requested € 14,000 / year
Antenna MonteOrfano (Resolution nr 8, 15/01/07)
Area 35 sq m, 30m height (actual 230m), contract duration 30 years
Amount requested 4320 € / year
Lacio the pleasure to present to comment.
August 17th, 2007 at 3:20 pm
For el Pistolero at home: quiet, my only aesthetic sensibility!
For Cavour: eloquent comparing yourself reported. Obviously the fact that the last five meters of trellis-monstre used for communications of Local Police and / or institutional uses (as written by Angelo Bergomi predendente in his report on the matter) made the City "concerned" to the artefact.
We are to see what we can do. I hope to see some post shortly by the Alpine Group of CAI, and many other citizens who exploit the area of democracy that we rovato.org is offering to make known their thoughts on the matter.
Finally, we await new details from Cinzia.
Prosit!
August 17th, 2007 at 4:53 pm
Good evening everyone. I hope that this site to publish a short speech of the Environment Protection Group Rovato.
Meanwhile invite all those who are in possession to send photographs of the mountain during the period in which there were both antennas. We need to make some comparisons.
For Cavour: cites the height of 230 m (above sea level, I think), sorry the question perhaps not intelligent, as has determined that share?
August 17th, 2007 at 6:30 pm
The article was published in the Chronicle.
Daniele