Rovato, square Palestro: The boyfriend leaves, she dishes sudden outburst from the window and ends the PSC to Iseo
![]()
The boy disappeared without trace, his "her" focus his anger by throwing furniture through the window of his home square Palestro, 20, a few meters from the place of the DS.
E 'is the incredible story happened in the capital of Franciacorta Sunday afternoon.
"Around 14 - tells us a avventrice the Viper Coffee, placed exactly opposite the palace indicted - we heard the screams.
Left on the street, we saw a young inveire against her boyfriend. Meanwhile, the girl threw dishes and buckets from the terrace of his home, from a height of more than 10 meters. "
Alerted some passers-by, within minutes arrived at a police patrol room Rovato who managed to enter the building and to secure the girl, 23enne Italian.
Once you reach the street, the young - which appears to have behind an accusation by a public official violence - has continued to vent his anger by taking kicked a couple of scooters parked in the square always Palestro.
In the end, the news Juliet was transported to the PSC (Social Center Pisco) Iseo, where - following further discussions - has been subjected to treatment.


















October 24th, 2007 at 10:40 am
Love is not good if not litigarello, it is true that there are more couples than one time and not even the half-season
October 24th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
from outside is easy to judge, but I can assure you that if you happen, mainly because of a "third" .... flywheel dishes!
After discussing it ... but the moment of anger ... I want to see if it is not!
October 25th, 2007 at 7:56 am
I know that only around there are many girls out of the poles ... I speak from experience ...
Regards!
October 25th, 2007 at 8:49 am
already ... and there are also those s you take away a wife or husband, I speak from experience!
it goes beyond the piles as you say ...
October 25th, 2007 at 12:49 p.m. pm
I do not want to be misunderstood, I do not want to enter in topic-specific girl, for which I am sorry for what happened.
I want to emphasize though, and here you can open the debate today is really hard to find (I speak from the male point of view) of girls with a minimum balance ... especially among thirties, prey to fears and anxieties that are not paranoia minimally explained ...
October 25th, 2007 at 1:58 pm
if one partner tries someone else out of the pair means that the same problems and the three players the "third inconvenience" is the culprit usually less ..
October 25th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
@ Punisher ... anxieties, fears and paranoia of that kind? referring to life and the future of torque torque (fear of betrayal, to tell you all my life, trying to live together .. etc) or purely personal (not sufficiently attractive physically, I realized the anxiety of One day I want a serious history while the next day I want to feel free .. etc)?
@ Neskers broadly agree even though each "manage a trois" is a story in itself.
October 25th, 2007 at 4:15 pm
When a live person and the person there are no moments, but this does not justify in my view, the search outside the couple. It seems a fairly usual behavior but did not agree. The third inconvenience, knows full well that it is in a position of strength, not absolve, is aware that is destroying something. I think in general terms that it must meet in order to understand, I can assure you that it is not pleasant.
October 25th, 2007 at 5:48 pm
I know of this incident, but they are often quite similar.
To many people's life couple is the only good thing in a life full of difficulties, from economic to the work that pays less and less to those of the greyness of the province of Brescia (Let's say that life rovatese "not brilliant") etc ...
In another context, it would certainly other kinds of reactions
October 26th, 2007 at 6:36 am
@ Lorena talking about the second case, you quote "exclusively personal in nature (they are not sufficiently attractive physically, I have the desire to create, a day I want a serious history while the next day I want to feel free .. etc)" is sincerely spiazzante have to deal with this type of women ... and putting all the good will is also hard to have a relationship that is not a "fast food" consumed in the short space of a few months or worse weeks!
October 26th, 2007 at 11:05 AM
The problems must be addressed and resolved in their appearance, it's usually easier, and to postpone undervalue, is increasing the difficulties in the solution.
Listen patiently who is close to us, believe in common goals, support, including fatigue, in difficult times, give up on the other, these are some requirements that allow a pair of walking together, to mature and become a single entity .
Without fatigue, not ever reach any goal!
October 26th, 2007 at 7:57 pm
@ Dory ... but just to "go to reason" from the U.S. really need a lot of maturity to the product in more than fundamental: Love
I agree come meeting, smooth, correct slightly, sometimes give in (1 step to make progress then 2) but not on a sacrifice or a waiver substantial and important part of one of the two in order to be with others ... sooner or later the subject "defeatist" presents the bill!
@ The Punisher bè after weeks of low attendance already six to grips with the insecurities of your personal LEI understand if you leave you lose ... .. But I can assure you girlie (not yet 30-enne but approaching), which usually first Frequently months a person who fascinates you really do not think if he can interfere with your freedom if the idea of a story makes you fear and even less to the size of your jeans need to think because the head and the loose!
.... I find that the passion is absolutely a good starting point ... then maybe get the paranoia ... but later ... much later!
(Note: there are men so paranoid, insecure and anxious after already ci sei exit 2 times and not even sure if taking the bitter coffee or sugar ... Aimè!)
October 27th, 2007 at 5:57 am
@ Lorena I know it is difficult to condense into a few lines of arguments that you could talk for hours, I would add that because a relationship with them is appropriate to both, is essential to love, respect, confidence, knowledge can count the 100% on, the passion it takes, but long term it is not essential. I could say that behind everything there must be a balance of torque between intelligence, skill, vision.
Starting with too many burdens on the shoulders of one of the two, is not favorable, and burdens not mean jeans size or type of car.
In love we must not act as a father or mother of their comrades,
those roles should have already left their mark education.
Not least, I dare say that love is not love ever in equal quantities, which may be one of two love to know more, with the positive or negative arising therefrom.
Good day.
October 27th, 2007 at 10:59 AM
When you return to talk about right vs. left?
October 27th, 2007 at 11:03 AM
When you want, no matter whether you like, change the page!
October 28th, 2007 at 6:42 am
love is commitment and memory, commitment to give up because others can grow and be happy memory to be able to remember what it was built together and together explore ways to grow. But love is also the desire and reason, but only desire is likely to become anguish if dissatisfied, then it must be the reason that assesses the sentiments not only their own but also those of others, to see if the desire to have and satisfaction as giving satisfaction to even
October 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
I was referring to the "passion" as dominant in the first phase of attendance / relationship between 2 persons. Things that have dettto Dory is that Jonah is still true because the synthesis of track as it should be building a solid Raport love mature and absolutely equal (while being aware that one would certainly love more than the other but a speech is whether in relation 1 to 10,000 or 10,000 infinity to infinity)
October 28th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
To satisfy Foia remaining on the chei tell the fate clement wanted up to now not ever love me of a guy right ... :-)
October 28th, 2007 at 5:35 pm
I dare say that love is not right or left, but the center of life.
October 28th, 2007 at 11:29 a.m. pm
if I start from a recognition of mutual equality, respect of the person surrendered to themselves for the good of others,
reaffirmed that all the expressions of cdx, who knows why disbelieve in practice, just read their literature, including the most recent to realize that there is any right or espllicita statement implied that the woman is below
October 29th, 2007 at 7:06 am
Perhaps those who make those statements, had no way of knowing other kind of woman .... Sorry.
Attacking or defending themselves do not know why, or rather diminish the quality of others to rise to a level that otherwise would not know how to reach.
With this background it is not building a relationship Parietaria, but subservience, is not that which can not be there, if accepted as a need, necessity, safety, and not necessarily the dominant role is that of men.